![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:08 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
In case the
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
gets kinja’d.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:12 |
|
“100% original” Has aftermarket wheels and what I am guessing is a factory original non-functioning parking brake?
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:15 |
|
Gotta admit that it’s likely rare at this point since that model included GM’s Self Stripping Paint, Paint Resistant Primer and Pre-Rusted body panels.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:17 |
|
For those who don’t speak maple syrup dollars, that’s 5675-ish US.
I can’t argue the thing looks very nice for it’s age, but I can’t fathom why...
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:24 |
|
Crack Pipe at $7500... especially since the 1988-1990 model looked so much better:
And the seller says insurance is only $200/year... no way that is true for full coverage insurance in Ontario unless they have it registered as a farm vehicle.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:26 |
|
Registered as a farm vehicle by a 70-year-old.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:29 |
|
I disagree on the looks, I prefer the more boxy looks over the updated smoothed out looks.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:29 |
|
Also, “has only seen one winter in 1989" but is posted in winter, with pictures clearly showing it in a winter that was definitely not taken in 1989.
Though maybe it was driven in the winter of 88-89 and not of 89-90, therefore making the statement “only seen one winter in 1989" correct. Perhaps.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:30 |
|
*rinses soap off car*
*drops hose*
*grabs camera*
I love it that so many photos of cars are so fresh after a wash that hoses, buckets, and wet driveways are in the photo. What’s the hurry, is there a dust storm coming in, and this was the only change you have to take photos?
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:32 |
|
Same, mini Monte-Carlo!
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:33 |
|
I was going to jump on the winter thing too, but there’s not much snow, could be June in ON :)
Seat also looks kind of dirty - something being flaunted for low miles needs to be detailed to perfection.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:34 |
|
Not much snow could be JANUARY in this part of Ontario.
JUNE in Edmonton :)
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:36 |
|
You are correct: When if comes to J-bodies, boxy was better than swoopy, coupe is better than sedan, Chevy > Buick > Pontiac > Cadillac > Olds, Z24 is better than base model, so this checks all the right boxes. Although frankly, I feel pretty awful saying anything positive about a J-body.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:37 |
|
The water on the paint makes it shiny and glossy, if they let the water dry then you’ll really see how dull and faded the paint is. Usually that can be solved with a good polish/buff, but that’s so much more work compared to a wash.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:42 |
|
Ha, I didn’t even click the link :D
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:43 |
|
I think it’s more “I’m lazy and am only washing this damn thing once, hand me the camera,” than “hiding under water”
Happens with people posting photos of their OWN cars on social media, too.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 12:58 |
|
Probably.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 13:02 |
|
I prefer smooooooth...
![]() 01/05/2017 at 13:50 |
|
I accidentally did that when I sold my last car. Almost put in a disclaimer about it in the ad lol.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 14:21 |
|
It’s stunning. I would buy it and daily the crap out of it, but not for $5700 US.
I love ‘80s 3-boxes so much, and many (if not most) are total garbage. Perhaps I need professional help.
![]() 01/05/2017 at 14:44 |
|
At a first glance, I thought it was a E30 M3 with square head lamps. Nonetheless, this is perfect for Concourse Lemons